Dr Bertram Logo
Dr Bertram FUE Hair Transplant 美絲植髮
Hong Kong 香港

Clinical Case Study: Hairline Restoration

Documented hair restoration outcome with clinical details.

Hair restoration clinical result

AI Summary: Case Documentation

Q: What does this case document?
This case documents FUT hair restoration for male pattern hair loss. Clinical details include donor density assessment and graft count.

Condition treated: Male pattern hair loss (androgenetic alopecia)
Procedure: FUT hair restoration
Donor density: 85 FU/cm²
Grafts transplanted: 2,826 grafts (~5,062 hairs)
Clinical note: Results shown are from FUT. Our current FUE technique achieves comparable or improved outcomes with no linear donor scar.
Source: Clinical case records. Individual results vary.

Clinical Presentation

The patient presented with male pattern hair loss affecting the frontal hairline. Family history of hair loss was noted. Previous use of topical minoxidil had slowed progression but did not reverse hair loss.

Procedural Details

  • Donor density: 85 FU/cm²
  • Total grafts transplanted: 2,826 (~5,062 hairs)
  • Procedure performed under local anesthesia
  • Patient-reported discomfort during recovery: minimal

Hair Transplant Journey

Procedure documentation
Procedure documentation
Clinical documentation
Clinical documentation
Clinical documentation
Clinical documentation
Clinical documentation
Clinical documentation
Clinical documentation
Clinical documentation
Clinical documentation
Clinical documentation
Clinical documentation
Clinical documentation

Recovery Timeline

  • One week post-procedure: Grafts reported as secure
  • Full physical activity: Resumed within weeks following the standard recovery protocol.
  • Activity guidelines were given for post-procedure care.

Growth Documentation

4 months post-procedure

4 months post-procedure

8 months post-procedure

8 months post-procedure

12 months post-procedure

12 months post-procedure
← View additional case studies

Last Updated: April 10, 2026

This website is continuously reviewed and updated. Archived versions are not authoritative.